Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Flipping Channels - Pt.3

We've already seen that entities believed to be friendly and honest (eg, trusted) have not always told us the truth. Rather, as Neo discovered in the first Matrix movie, he wasn't ready for the truth (the Oracle's message for him). It was only after he experienced more of the life which surrounded him did his beliefs and values change so that he could believe and thereby change his reality. They (Messengers or Oracles) tell us what we need to hear. That's why there are so many channelers and messages; and it is also why there are so many different religions, denominations, churches, and sermons - as well as new-age teachings on every subject imaginable. We are drawn to what suits us. As we change, other forms of messages or oracles will appear to help us continue. There is no 'one' message or oracle. There are as many as we need. 

"It is only once the Student is ready to learn that the Master will appear."


Pole Shift Predictions
Nancy Lieder, who channels messages from the Zeta Reticuli, received enormous flack for her information regarding the anticipated pole shift in 2003. It never happened as the Zetas stated it would. They are well known for their accuracy, so what happened? In that case, there was a lesson to be gained and in order for us to learn what our World Governments planned to do under such circumstances, they (the govt's) needed to believe that it was immanent and when the date came and went without a shift of the poles, the rest of humanity was left looking at their leader's actions - or lack thereof. Incidentally, the Zetas are currently saying that the shift will occur before the year 2012, which has people (some are the same from 2003) preparing food supplies and safe-havens, such as underground shelters or relocation to various countries or states deemed protected from harm. This time, they are not relying on the Government to help them. Then again, there are others who say no pole shift will occur or occur before the year 2012 or in our lifetime.

Shift into Aquarius
Right now, many believe that we will shift from the Age of Pisces to the Age of Aquarius on December 21, 2012. This is according to various interpretations of the Mayan Long-Count Calendar. What if the dates are wrong and our interpreters got something wrong in the calculation? What if Carl Jung was wrong in his definition of when an age is entered? 

The transition into the next 'New Age', that of Aquarius, was believed to transpire at numerous times in our recent past. For example, Aleister Crowley once received word from a bodiless Egyptian entity that the New Age would begin in the year 1904 AD. Krishnamurti channeled Lord Maitreya that this transition would occur in 1911 AD. According to interpretations of Nostradamus's writings, he predicted that it would occur in the year 1975 AD, in 1997 AD, in 2000 AD, in 2023 AD, and lastly the year 2160 AD.  Suzy Ward received the year 2012 by her deceased son Matthew. You might consider all of these channeled messages. So when is the transition of ages? Many in Religious and New-Age circles would rather seek advice from channelers or their priest, rather than from scientists or historians because of their track-records and a perceived 'closed-mindedness' (as if a lack of Spirituality).

According to Astrological Historian, Dr Shepherd Simpson, the age shift will occur around the year 2600 AD. This idea is based on 1900 year-old star charts and the positions of current star constellations. The clip below is a resulting animation of star-chart processions, beginning from the year 4000 BC to the year 3000 AD. I have added some text to help point out a few points.

(Video Duration: 1:17)

The green boundaries outline the known constellations and the red circle in the middle is the point in which the Vernal Equinox and the Celestial Equator intersect. As this intersection passes from one constellation into another, this is defined by Carl Jung as the transition into another age.

What if Carl Jung was wrong or what if the size of constellations are incorrect? You can see from these charts that some constellations are larger than others, so why do many believe the zodiac is divided into 12 equal 30-degree segments? If you add in the 13th constellation named Ophiuchus, that would be 13 equal 27.69-degree segments. However, other sources suggest that we cannot define each of the constellations using equal proportions, which would appear to agree with what we see in these star charts. For instance, they suggest that Scorpio is 6.5 degrees, Libra is 23 degrees, Sagittarius is 33.5 degrees, Ophiucus is 18.5 degrees, and Virgo is 44 degrees. As you can see in the video clip above, Pisces looks huge compared to Aries. It's believed that the common Zodiac chart is roughly 89% incorrect.


My point to this is that reading of the star constellations is one method to determine when the shift into the next heralded new age will occur. Other ways exist and it's up to us to determine what we find acceptable. The same is true for the impending pole shift, your odds at the lottery, or anything provided by channels, priests, etc. 

As you saw in the 2003 Pole Shift summary, even though the ETs provided a date of the flipping of Earth's north and south poles, it didn't happen. However, there are those who chose to believe and took action. When the world governments didn't do anything to prepare humanity for it, those who were watching learned something. Now that it's being reported to happen before 2012, the lesson they learned is obvious - not to trust in anyone other than yourself.  This has, in a way, allowed them the opportunity to turn inward and away from those they previously gave their power to. They are in the process of reclaiming their self-determination and self-reliance. This same lesson could be applied to everything in this post. 

From 2012 Trailer
(Video Duration: 1:15)

Do we blindly accept what we are told, as Miguel Ruiz says we have been taught to? Do we research suggested ideas before we accept them, like we're all told to do? Or will we accept what will fit nicely with our existing beliefs when presented a new idea? The messenger or message we should accept/believe is decided in that moment, by each of us. If we later realize that it wasn't the best person or message after all, a lesson was learned and you move on to another. 

Eventually, you are likely to hear that we need to stop looking for answers outside of ourselves and go within. In one respect, this is exactly why we perceive information to be incorrect or conflicting. Sooner or later, we are bound to let go of our need to look outward and will reclaim our power within. This is an important step for all of us, but don't be surprised if you later realize that you are once again lead back outside of yourself. This is not traveling in a simple 360-degree circle, to end up back where you started. No. This is about traveling in a 360-degree upward spiral. When it looks like you are back to where you started, the view will be different and therefore your experiences will be different. You will have evolved consciously during that time, ascending the spiral so to speak, so that your beliefs and values in the end will not be the same as they were when you started out.  

As discussed in part 3 of the Beliefs & Values post, at some point we will come to understand how we're all connected, how we're all one, and judgment will be replaced by unconditional love. The reason for my comment, "you are once again lead back outside yourself", is that once you've gone within your world-view will change. You will find that all that is outside of you is really all that is inside of you, but you wouldn't know it unless you went through this 'turning in' process. 
All of this will lead you to understand the real meaning of the phrase, 'truth is relative'. Truth is directly related to each of our individual belief and value systems for our place on the spiral path. As we grow and mature, these beliefs and values change, thereby redefining what is true. We should therefore remember to be flexible in our attitudes about beliefs - our own or someone else's.

Furthermore, you may begin to understand what it means that everything is an illusion. Our entire reality is based on these systems of beliefs, so if there's no 'one' truth about something, then whatever we have accepted or will accept, becomes relative to our immediate reality - hence it's all an illusion.


Someone once asked how much money the USA gives in aid to the country or state of Israel every year. One answered what they saw on TV, another what they read in the newspaper, another laughed at them and said it was $3 Billion, because of what was in the CIA World Factbook. Well, that too is not the real answer, regardless of whether or not the amount fluctuates each year. That version of the factbook is considered UNCLASSIFIED and available to the public. There is another version, which is classified SECRET. I can tell you that the numbers provided in that version are not the same. If I were to say that was the final answer, I would be wrong as well. There are TOP SECRET compartmentalized variations, depending on your need to know. The higher you climb, the number may get larger and larger, but I think that in the end, there is no definitive answer. Why? Because of secret projects; black ops; compartmentalization where the right hand isn't told what the left hand is doing; lack of accountability or oversight; the use of illegal drug trafficing monies to fund operations; etc. But most importantly, because defining what is considered 'aid' or what 'aid' means, must first go through a human being's belief paradigm... and no two are alike!

I leave you with this final video.

(Video Duration: 21:38)

No comments: