"Many people have heard the theory that AIDS is man-made. Thirty percent of New York City blacks polled by The New York Times (October 29, 1990) actually believe AIDS is an "ethnic weapon" designed in a laboratory to infect and kill black people. Some people even think the AIDS conspiracy theory is more plausible than the African Green monkey theory promoted by the leading AIDS scientists. Actually, the monkey theory was proven wrong by researchers as far back as 1988, but most AIDS educators continued to promote it to the public until recently. In a media blitz in 1999, the green monkey theory was totally replaced by the chimpanzee "out of Africa" theory, and the chimp origin of AIDS was fully accepted by the scientific community." - source: The Secret Origin of AIDS and HIV
Panel with Dr. Gallo
(Video Duration: 8:35)
From 1988 Documentary on Dr. Strecker's Memorandum
(Video Duration: 1:36:49)
!! THIS IS A MUST SEE VIDEO !!
Claims that AIDS is a man-made genetic killer designed to "reduce" the worlds non-White populations received additional support from a prominent psychologist, Dr. Frances Cress Welsing, in her book entitled The Isis Papers, The Keys To The Colors, where she supplies some background information that shows that AIDS could be the result of years of secret research.
On page 298,
"In 1932, the year before Adolph Hitler came to power in Germany, in Tuskegee, Alabama, U.S.A., another destruction was being conducted against people who were classified as non-white by people who classified themselves as white doctors, scientists and government officials. This planned destruction was the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. "
From 1932 to 1972, a total of 40 years, United States Public Health, Macon County Health Department, Tuskegee Institute, Veterans Hospital in Tuskegee and private physicians in and around Macon County deliberately planned to withhold treatment from more than 400 Black men who were suffering from syphilis. It was verbalized that the program would be a means for getting rid of the Black people in the U.S. (This destructive deception recently ended, under pressure, in the year 1972).
"Very shortly thereafter, the disease which we now refer to as AIDS began to surface in the U.S. The populations focused upon as being infected with the AIDS virus were first the white male homosexuals and the subsequently Black and Hispanic people. More specifically, the projected source of the virus was/is said to be African people who had been bitten by the African Green Monkey or the Vervet Monkey. "
In 1969, a book entitled A Survey of Chemical and Biological Warfare, by John Cookson and Judith Nottingham, published by the Monthly Review Press. The book is described in its cover as follows: "Derived from a three year study conducted by a British biochemist and geneticist and a British political scientist, the text affords a comprehensive review of material used, and policies adopted by authorities in the U.S., Canada, Great Britain, and West Germany."
It also states that it
"...provides one of the most comprehensive views on the subject of chemical and biological warfare written for the layman, The authors, who were well qualified, produced a vast amount of documentation of the use and research on these types of weapons."
"The question of whether new diseases could be used is of considerable interest, Vervet monkey disease (African Green Monkey Disease) may well be an example of a whole new class of disease-causing organisms. Handling of blood and tissue without precaution causes infection. It is unaffected by any antibiotic substance so far tried and is unrelated to any other organism. It causes fatality in some cases and can be venereally transmitted in man. In the words of Dr. C.E. Gordon Smith, 'it has possible potential as an infectious disease of man. It presumably is also of BW (biological warfare) interest. New diseases are continually appearing (chikungunya and o'nyong-nyong fever for example). In addition to these there are the possibilities of virus and bacteria being genetically manipulated to produce 'new' organisms. "
"Just recently a great deal of useful work has been done on the Vervet Monkey Disease (African Green Monkey Disease) which caused seven deaths in Germany."
Reports of progress were:
"sent to 40 laboratories all over the world; 9 of these have been supplied with infective material and/or antisera [vaccine]: 4 in the USA and one each in Germany, Panama, South Africa, Uganda and the USSR. A non-infective complement fixing antigen has been prepared to the WHO (World Health organization) reference laboratories." -Hansard, May 1968
***
Additionally, the lab-created virus was given the name of "Vervet or Green Monkey Disease". Now that 'name' was documented in 1968. What does that suggest, knowing we were told in the 1980's that the disease or virus originated from a Vervet Monkey/Green Monkey that bit someone in Africa? And why send the materials to these labs (countries) and why send the WHO a non-infective complement (protective) antigen? This would suggest the ability to then re-create supplies of their own and for use on their own peoples - as well as inoculate those deemed worthy. It would also allow those at the WHO to protect themselves... as they continue to inject unsuspecting people with infected vaccines!
No comments:
Post a Comment